..
...
| In
mobilization we have two different meanings of “value" which are used
in two different contexts. (1) When we “evaluate”
(eg project progress) we make a value judgement: right vs wrong, good vs
bad, or beautiful vs ugly. |
. |
(2)
When we promote income or wealth generation, in the fight against poverty,
we say that money is not wealth
as such, but wealth is any good or service that has value, ie is both scarce
and useful. When we add value, we create (generate)
wealth. |
...
. .
| Values-Aesthetics
Dimension of Community: |
.
| The
aesthetic-value dimension of community
is the structure of ideas, sometimes paradoxical, inconsistent, or contradictory,
that people have about good and bad, about beautiful and ugly, and about
right and wrong, which are the justifications that people may cite to explain
their actions. Ideology. |
. |
A
dimension
of culture. Basic unit = symbol. See "Culture."
Learned; not transmitted genetically. |
..
.
.
| If
you take anything of value, say some seeds harvested from your farm, and
add some value to it, say by crushing and squeezing the seeds to produce
oil and pulp. You have added value. The seeds have more value when you
convert them to oil. |
.. |
Similarly,
when you take some wood, which has some value, and convert it into a chair,
it obtains more value. What value that you have added is wealth
that you have created or generated. Any
income
generation scheme must create wealth rather then merely transfer
money or other resources. |
...
.
.
| A
Venn diagramme is a diagramme consisting of several circles, each circle
representing a sub set of a whole. Some of the circles may overlap, indicating
that some of the sub sets overlap in some characteristics. |
. |
In
community work and sociology, the whole can be the community and each circle
can represent a group within that community. Some of those groups may overlap,
and that is represented by where the circles overlap. |
.
...
.
.
| Whenever
there is social change that appears to benefit some people, but others
fear they will lose something, there will be resistance to change. When
you mobilize a community to change its level of self reliance, there will
be some resistance to change. Some of it will merely be because
some people are more comfortable with the old way and fear new ways. Others
will fear that they will lose (financially, politically) by the
change; they have a vested interest in the old way. |
.......... |
Here
is a very simple example. Say there is a group which has only two classes,
very rich and very poor. If you tried to change the group so that all would
be the same, the poor would agree (to getting richer) but the rich have
vested interests (in staying rich) and would resist the change. |
..
.
.
| A
human settlement (habitat) that is characterized
by small population, low population density, and social simplicity (eg
homogeneity, little division of labour). |
. |
There
are no universally agreed measurements for these three variables, so dorps,
hamlets and villages lay near one end of the spectrum and cities and mega-cities
lay near the other end, with towns and peri-urban settlements in between.
These three variables affect methods of community strengthening. (See "city,") |
.
.
.
| In
ordinary vocabulary, to have "vision" means to be "able to see." In our
developmental jargon, to have "vision" is almost spiritual or psychic,
being able to see the future, the possibilities of how things could be.
A "visionary" is a leader who sees great possibilities. |
. |
While
community members do not all have to be visionaries in that sense, they
need to have some idea of what they would like to see their community become.
They need a "destination." They need to think of where they would like
to go. Before they can plan where to go, they have to know where that "where"
is. The job of the mobilizer is to counteract attitudes of complacency,
apathy and fatalism, to instil in community members an idea that they can
have some control over their destiny, and that they should imagine where
they could go. |
...
.
.
| "Vulnerable"
generally means "unprotected" or "exposed," implying that someone or something
is weak and unable to completely care for itself. |
. |
In
relief work, vulnerable often is used as a collective of children, disabled
(physical and mental) and sometimes women. Very often relief work, using
the charity method, identifies vulnerable
people as the main beneficiaries. In development
work, in contrast, we have to resist the idea of giving something for nothing,
because that in itself weakens the recipients. |
...
.
––»
«––.
|
